For decades, the labour and employment laws have been treated as a policy promise, something that the government kept announcing, something that companies filed away under “monitor and review,” something that would require action eventually.

That “eventually” arrived in November 2025, when the Central Government notified the reformed labour codes. These codes replaced 29 central labour laws, consolidating them into four comprehensive legislations. The Rules under the Code on Wages, Industrial Relations, Social Security, and Occupational Safety & Health have finally been notified on May 9, 2026, completing a legal architecture five years in the making.

For decades, Indian employers navigated a maze of about 30 separate central labour laws, some written for an economy that no longer existed, many overlapping, most requiring separate compliance machinery which resulted in tedious records and ambiguous systems. The four Codes sweep all of that away, replacing a fragmented inspection regime, facilitating a unified compliance interface, streamlining enforcement and enabling effective adjudication.

The Rules operationalize what the Codes had framed in principle, specifying the forms, the timelines, the procedures, the digital infrastructure.

The wage structure question

Section 2(y) of the Code on Wages redefines it which will have a direct, mathematical effect on every statutory contribution an employer makes. Wages under the Code means basic pay, dearness allowance, and retaining allowance. Everything else like, house rent allowance, conveyance, special allowance, food coupons etc. is excluded. However, those excluded components together ought not exceed fifty percent of total cost-to-company. The excess gets pulled back into the wage definition and becomes the basis for calculating provident fund contributions, gratuity, bonus, and ESI.

Over years, as companies sought to optimise payroll costs, a chunk of the cost-to-company would be in the form of excluded allowances, most of which were excluded from statutory computation. The Code ends this arrangement and the ambiguity.

Thus, restructuring is not optional but overdue. It is pertinent for employers to restructure the components of CTC to avoid imposition of any statutory dues and liabilities.

Fixed-term workers: The loophole that has been closed

For much of the past decade, fixed-term employment contracts became a quiet industry. Companies have been using rolling one year contracts and sometimes shorter ones to keep workers in a category exempted from statutory benefits like gratuity which prescribed a minimum service requirement.

The Industrial Relations Code and the Social Security bring this malpractice to an end. Fixed-term employees are now entitled to the same benefits as permanent workers like, leave entitlements, social security coverage and gratuity after one year of service, calculated on a pro-rata basis.

Any workforce model that is built on the premise that fixed-term contracts exist outside the statutory benefits framework is no longer legally tenable.

The rules notification is not merely a procedural milestone. Several obligations become practically executable only now that the rules have prescribed the forms and timelines. Employers need to understand what has changed operationally.

Appointment letters must be issued to every employee not as a matter of good HR practice, but as a mandatory obligation under the OSHWC Code, 2020. It extends to existing employees as well.  It also prescribed the precise format for such appointment letters with provisions for disclosure of wages, designation, work conditions, leaves, social security benefits etc.

Annual health check-ups by a qualified medical practitioner is mandatory for every worker aged forty and above, in the prescribed format for documentation. This is an employer-funded obligation, not a voluntary welfare measure. Similarly, Crèche facilities are mandatory for every establishment with fifty or more employees.

The new codes also provide for detailed obligations of employers for women working night shifts. It is imperative that the employer must obtain written consent, arrange transport, install CCTV in workplace facilities including washrooms, and display emergency contact numbers both at the workplace and inside transport vehicles.

Finally, Grievance Redressal Committees are mandatory in every establishment employing twenty or more workers. The rules now specify the composition, timebound disposal of grievance,  and provision for a conciliation officer.

Retrenchment has a new cost line

The IR Code adds an obligation for companies that are or will be restructuring. In addition to retaining the retrenchment compensation framework, it has introduced Workers’ Re-Skilling Fund contributions. It is an additional fifteen days’ wages per retrenched worker, to be credited into the worker’s account within forty-five days of retrenchment.

The Code also introduces operational measures to reduce the legal deterrent to hiring. The retrenchment permission threshold has moved upward, from one hundred workers to three hundred. Establishments in the hundred to two-hundred-and-ninety-nine worker band no longer need prior government permission for lay-off, retrenchment, or closure but prior notice to the government is still mandated.

The gig economy boost

The Social Security Code recognises gig and platform workers as a distinct category and creates a statutory social security framework for them.

Aggregators that engage gig workers must contribute between 1-2% of their annual turnover, subject to a cap of 5 percent of total payments made to gig and platform workers, into a dedicated central social security fund.

E-comm platforms and aggregators have operated in the grey area of worker classification, treating workers interchangeably as employees, contractors or vendors according to operational convenience. While the Social Security Code does not settle the classification debate, it creates a concrete statutory obligation regardless of how that question ultimately resolves.

The compliance environment has quietly shifted

The old system was opaque, not necessarily by design but by consequence. Multiple inspectors, overlapping jurisdictions, paper registers and ambiguous return filings created an environment where enforcement was uneven and coverage was thin. Employers weighed the probability of being caught against the cost of compliance, mostly calculating in favour of the latter.

The new system is built around a single digital portal, unified return filling system, eight electronically maintained registers, and a single compliance interface. Non-compliance is easier to detect when the data is centralised and comparable across establishments.

The show-cause and compliance notice approach has been introduced for the first time in Indian labour law under the four Codes, means the first enforcement interaction may be advisory rather than penal but it creates a documented record. A subsequent failure to act will not be a mere oversight.

A word on state rules

The full operational force of the Codes requires both Central and state rules. The Central rules are now in place. Most states have published draft rules and several have notified final rules. Tracking state-level notification status is an ongoing task for multi-state employers. It is not, however, a reason to defer structural changes like, CTC restructuring, appointment letters, grievance committee constitution, crèche planning etc. that flow from the Codes themselves and do not depend on procedural rules.

The harder question

The four Labour Codes, taken together, represent a considered policy choice to extend formal legal protection to a much wider share of India’s workforce like gig workers, platform workers, fixed-term employees, inter-state migrant workers etc.

The new labour codes and rules eliminate that unfair advantage of such employers who built part of their competitive edge on non-compliance, whether through artificially low PF bases, tweaking gratuity provisioning for contractual workers, neglected welfare obligations etc. The new system is designed to identify the breaches far faster and enforce compliance more effectively than the old regime ever could. The digital infrastructure makes compliance and enforcement easier than it has ever been in Indian labour history.

India spent five years building this framework. The 2026 rules notification was the last brick.

END OF ARTICLE